Saturday, March 26, 2016

Humanity and Our Continual Need for War

Does it require an exceptional individual or any particular think tank to recognize humanity is teetering on the very brink of calamitous disaster? A significant percentage of humanity is suffering immensely, yet the majority of this is brought on by the way we do things in our existence. Most governmental leaders function in a way facilitating their power and influence for their own benefit rather than the benefit of the people they represent or lead, and there are numerous governments that unfortunately perceive their people as something to be quashed or controlled. Few societies function peacefully anywhere on this planet and then only because they’re quite small in size and scope coupled with most being in agreement of the situation or at least in acquiescence to it. Fewer societies operate with a working financial system functioning for the benefit of the said society as a whole and in fact, most are forcing upon themselves severe financial hardship. Multiculturalism has failed so horribly that everywhere this experiment has taken place suffers immense adversity few can explain honestly. Religious dogma runs the mindset of most people despite the claims of secular tolerance and there is at least one major religious doctrine demanding all others toe its line or face annihilation.

Places where life is relatively peaceful are far too few and far between, and most places endure continual trouble emanating from more sources than most can identify. Further, it seems there are too few people who desire any form of peace in their world unless an insurmountable and numerous amount of unrealistic demands are met. Few countries can claim a hefty amount of strong allies yet many harbor numerous potential enemies of some level of threat. In fact, many countries, most to be fair, are strictly out for the benefit of their specific homeland and are more than happy to see their society benefit from the suffering and woes of other nations. A few of these nations, such as North Korea, function to appease the psychopathy of one influential individual who wallows in grand megalomania while the citizenry is reduced to a hostage crisis.

Racial tensions are at a breaking point despite the impressive gains made on the front of easing these tensions. Tolerance is at such an all-time low that people feel more than comfortable in confronting others around them for the slightest of irritants. Demands are so widespread and numerous that they’re equitable to the amount of people making such demands and yet no other demands matter but the ones claimed by those claiming them. Many Islamists demand the world convert to their way of thinking and believing or else, and far too few people even care to recognize their world is akin to a plane in a tailspin spiraling to the ground.

The world seems continually at the brink of war and most people today find such an outcome just shy of inevitable. Honestly, many look forward to it. Preparing for an upcoming apocalypse has become trendy and quite in vogue; so much so that those who aren’t on the bandwagon are seen as sure to suffer and die when the shit hits the fan. They should’ve read the pamphlet.

Is this what we are? Does this really make sense that in this day and age and after our kind recognizes the incalculable suffering the world has endured in the past we should focus on ensuring the suffering of the past wanes in comparison to what’s to come?

So it would seem. There are still vast amounts of people alive today who were there to witness and endure the Holocaust that occurred during WWII, yet it seems there are so many more who believe it wasn’t nearly bad enough and needs to be repeated and then escalated to levels the world has not seen since the catastrophe ending the era of the dinosaur. The percentage of people who believe only their way is the way is so high that these people are seeking grander endeavors in order to ensure their approach rises above all the rest, at just about any cost, even when they know with confidence their philosophy and methodology only serves their microcosmic interests at the expense of just about everyone else.

How could we possibly expect the world to function into the long-term in this manner? It seems that very question has no place in the dialogue and rhetoric we hear from every rooftop.

We have to consider that such suffering and violence has been a significant part of the human landscape since time immemorial. The civilizations of the past two centuries have actually lessened the problem to some degree (based on the rise in the human population over the past two centuries despite the warfare) but it seems this is akin to tectonic plates pushing against one another for far too long. The illustration here is to indicate when minor earthquakes occur it’s due to smaller shifts, but great pressure built up for too long breaks loose with tremendous force, causing catastrophe. This helps color in the point that humanity just might be building up to a grand and horrifying quake that will surely be felt around the world.

The Book of Revelations tells of the End Times, but this is not the only series of prophecies warning of this. Islam also harbors similar prophecies, and even Nostradamus warns the world will suffer the greatest woes of warfare before a grand peace eventually reigns supreme. There is no way of knowing surely if any of this will certainly come to pass and most secularists find these claims baseless, superstitious and bizarre.

But historical relevance certainly helps us prophesy where we are going via empirical data, and it doesn’t appear attractive. All the signs indicate we are on a precarious brink.

I believe it’s wise to peer at our kind from outside it if we can. Religious doctrine will say what it will, but we can easily recognize we are a creature not much unlike any other creature in existence (but for extraordinary exceptions). What’s more, we are a predatory creature and an apex one at that. While at first glance this may seem as though we face few if any significant predators hunting our kind (unless one wanders in the wilderness unprotected or bleeds in shark-infested waters) but Nature always demands a sense of balance. Lions, crocodiles and other predators help keep down the wildebeest population and frogs eat bugs, snakes eat frogs, falcons eat snakes and perhaps the eagle may prey on the falcon if he isn’t careful. A bear just might kill a wolf for a deer kill. My taxonomic skills just aren’t to par but the point is that there really isn’t anything out there killing us; a predator that masters most environments it chooses even at the expense of the indigenous species is dangerous by any standard. This has allowed us to expand from eons of maintaining a world population of somewhere near two billion to ballooning to more than seven billion in less than two centuries. To add to this, the human population has nearly doubled in the last fifty years, and that population fifty years ago was a record at the time.

Is it a stretch to assume something might be looming on the horizon?

The state of the world combined with upset balances in most ecosystems and even the global influence demonstrates there has been a level of upset in the balance of human coexistence. Now, we hear untold amounts of people crying concerns about climate change and continual extinctions brought about by human influence and irresponsibility, but it’s safe to assume Man will not tower over the power of Nature Itself. Humanity is as susceptible to the ravages of nature just as much as any other species. But what Nature wants from us is still a mystery, although the mystery itself seems as evident as a typhoon.

This point deserves more light on its matter. It is more than reasonable to assume Humanity harbors no power over Nature and in fact, everything Humanity is results from the dictates of Nature. A shimmering urban center is no less natural than a beehive or coral reef. Neon lighting is no less natural than the light of the sun or the luminescence of the firefly. The city bus is no less natural than the wings of the eagle. Human technology is Nature’s way of acknowledging technology is necessary for life. To testify, sixty-five million years ago, Nature learned the entire planet could suffer irreparable damage and potentially suffer global extinction, so we can hypothesize it chose a species to develop a means of global or planetary migration when regional migration proved insufficient.

This is an assumption but a sound one. Further, humanity developed a great compassion (not always easily seen, one must admit) and could someday save the future of innumerable species of this planet long after the planet is no longer capable of supporting life. Yea, it seems as though I’m reaching but this assertion is easily defendable with an extended moment’s explanation. At least it would be difficult to dismiss out of hand.

But Nature has made it abundantly clear that trial-and-error is the key to evolutionary progress. So it stands to reason Nature offered humanity the means to be the apex species leading all Terran life into the future away from this planet, but something akin to more than 99% of all species have lost out in the past after proving unable to cope with the changes. Science hypothesizes this planet has seen several mass extinctions over the past few billion years. Could it be that humanity has failed the tests placed before it and we are now at the brink of self-annihilation to make way for a more fitting species to develop Sentience and Civilization?

Nature offers us the options. Our nuclear capabilities (no less natural than a beaver dam) offer to propel us into a high-tech future or to eradicate our future entirely. Nature offers us the ability to reason and exercise logic, but verily through the prism of an effective predator. After all, those who prowl the urban streets with the intent to attack the elderly have to exercise some significant logistical thought in order to pull the caper off and then escape to either enjoy the spoils or high-five one another in celebration.

It is fair to say we are at a severe crossroads. We can accept the challenges to our intelligent and civilized mind in order to find a way to a better global society someday capable of reaching the stars, or we can fester in our predatory intolerance and destroy ourselves to pave the way for the next sentient species. The successful child predator has to pay close attention to the details and not miss one bullet point.

But, there’s more to consider than just the mayhem. These ancient and various prophecies often tell of a great peace and rising of civilization after the apocalypse in one form or another. Does Nature demand a grand cleansing across the species to teach us one final lesson of peace and tolerance? Does Humanity have to entertain the brink of extinction to learn how to prosper and advance? Conflicts between countries today are no less natural than the conflicts between Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons ages ago, or between ant hills. After all, science has shown there were once numerous species of humanity at various points in time. There’s but one today, despite all the claims to the contrary.

Some would argue about the on the brink assumption but we have to consider that we chose to become dependent on our technology. We would not simply revert to who and what we were in 1770; we no longer possess the skills. We couldn’t even revert back to 1900. The loss of modern technology at this moment (the grid going down and all going dark with no reliable method of getting it running again) is expected to see population reduction by as much or perhaps more than 90% within less than a year, and there’s no way to ascertain how long those left would need to regain peace and civility, particularly since predation against one another would be the primary way to survive. Why? Because that is the only instinct we possess.

What humanity is today is unlike anything it has been in the past. There are so many more of us than there were two centuries ago, and those skills from then are all but gone. Nearly everything we do today is entirely dependent on satellite technology, or at least modern technology. Just about every semi moving in the Unites States and most other countries depends on today’s technology, so if that technology is lost, they stop. Commerce and distribution would cease, and then what? Just about all communication would cease. We would go from being able to communicate globally to simply word-of-mouth. Civilization would collapse to chaos and then we can only assume the wreckage to come. We can safely assume it would be horrific. The strong and predatory would exact heinous chaos and violence all around, and no child, particularly girls, would ever be safe. In fact, sex slaves would likely replace gold as one of our more valuable assets. Hey, it’s what we are.

But some sort of phoenix would rise from the ashes eventually. Would humanity regain what it lost and turn everything back on? Certainly the human population would be so severely reduced that those surviving would have plenty to keep them busy. It’s just a matter of who is left having the ability and skill set to even recognize what’s before them. Evacuate everyone from today and bring in those from two hundred years ago, and then task them with mastering today’s environment, its technology and options. It’s easy to assume it just wouldn’t happen anytime soon, and all those satellites out there would continue on their journeys whilst all below is perfectly oblivious to them until they fall.

But there being so few people and so much to do just might be the very point. Returning to a civilized state and being respectful of some sort of law while getting the power on while others find something to do with all the rotting bodies may be what’s required for our kind to see what we’ve done to ourselves and the rest of the planet. Is this what we’re getting ready to do? While I have no way of knowing one way or another, I do believe my examination and interpretations of the situation as it stands harbors weight, even if for no other reason than simply because an honest look at the world today reveals a pathway so unsustainable that a major paradigm shift is inevitable, and the way we’ve always done such a shift is through warfare. That’s just simple history. And how bizarre is it that not long ago the world saw a holocaust of unimaginable horror and yet today another one promising to be even worse is blooming while we all sit back and chow on pizza and watch through bored eyes. So to see one roll their eyes to the mere mention of societal collapse prompts one to almost feel sorry for these blinded fools.

This particular post is reaching its end, but I hope to further on the point as time goes by and I would hope to see some dialogue erupt as a result of these examinations. And what to do in the meantime? Well, there are a lot of people far ahead of me, so I first recommend paying attention to them. The Prepping Industry is thriving as well as those who teach reality-based self-defense, and companies selling non-firearm weapons (because the AR-15 is dazzlingly wonderful in its effectiveness…until it runs out of bullets) are doing wonderful. People all around you are learning to bug out, fight, engage in combat with blades and blunt force, and survive in a calamitous environment. It might behoove you to get on some bandwagon while you can.

But none of this means we have no pathway to improve before we reach some resemblance of a zombie apocalypse. So while it’s smart to have a way to defend yourself and your family, we should be even more attentive on engaging in conversations and activity designed to level the plane before it plows into the mountainside or the sea. That’s because doing so won’t necessarily stop the apocalypse from occurring (it seems inevitable to me, to be honest) but at least we’ll have some damage control in place when TSHTF.


Because let’s face it; we’re only at our best when things are at their worst.